Quality and safety investigation of commonly used topical cosmetic preparations | Scientific Reports

2022-11-05 23:53:27 By : Ms. Livia Xu

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Scientific Reports volume  12, Article number: 18299 (2022 ) Cite this article Wholesale Glass Packaging

Quality and safety investigation of commonly used topical cosmetic preparations | Scientific Reports

Cosmetic and personal care products are considered an essential part of our daily care routine; hence, these products must be stable and safe for human use. This study aimed to assess the quality and safety of the most common cosmetic preparations. To select the products to be tested, a cross-sectional survey was distributed featuring the most used types and brands of products. Based on 447 responses from both males and females with different ages and education levels, 21 products from different brands were selected and tested in terms of microbial load, heavy metal content, and organoleptic properties. Microbial contamination was investigated using the aerobic plate count method. Lead (Pb), aluminum (Al), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), and arsenic (As) impurities were analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. The products included sunblock, lip balm, hand cream, hair cream, shampoo, cleanser, baby oil, baby powder, bar soap, hair dye, makeup, deodorant, hair serum, shaving gel, and toothpaste. Microbial contamination was found in 14 of the products, ranging between 1467.5 and 299.5 cfu/ml. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus species. Most of the tested products showed metal impurities, with toothpaste having the highest concentrations of Pb, Cr, As, Cu and Ni. The samples did not show lumps or discoloration, did not have characteristic odors, and had pH values ranging from 6.90 to 8.10. The continuous usage of such products could lead to serious negative consequences. As a result, ensuring the quality of cosmetic products is critical. Regulatory authorities are required to enforce strict legislation on cosmetic manufacturing to assess and ensure the quality and safety of the products before they reach consumers.

Cosmetic is a Greek word that means ‘adorn’; these products are derived from natural and synthetic resources to improve the appearance and/or function of the skin. Historically, numerous compounds from natural sources have been used as cosmetics, such as henna, lavender, peppermint, rosemary, cedar, rose, aloe, olive oil, sesame oil, and almond oil1. Currently, cosmetic products are considered an essential part of the daily care routine2. Cosmetic products can be used dermally, orally or be inhaled. Topical applications are the most common route of cosmetics exposure3. Products that fall under this category can be in the form of creams, gels, ointments, pastes, suspensions, lotions, foams, sprays, and aerosols4. Topical cosmetic products, commonly known as personal care products, are among the most consumed products globally; their accessibility and widespread availability make their purchase easier than ever. These products are intended to be rubbed, sprinkled, poured, or sprayed for cleansing, beautifying, adding attractiveness or modifying the physical appearance to several body parts, such as the hair, skin, and nails5. Therefore, these preparations must be effective, stable, and safe for human use.

Quality assurance and monitoring are significant practices that guarantee that cosmetics preparations are safe and effective6,7. A desired quality in the finished product is granted when the quality is controlled and maintained in each step from acquiring the raw material until the product reaches the consumer6,8. As cosmeceutical and cosmetic products are continuously produced and introduced into the market, quality concerns have increased3.

One serious concern with the quality and safety of topical cosmetic products in different parts of the world is microbial contamination9. The high percentage of the water contents in these preparations make it an ideal condition for bacteria growth. For example, a study that investigated the quality of topical cosmetic products of eleven herbal ointments commonly found on the Ghanaian market showed some quality deviations in these products10; the study found that the majority of the examined products were contaminated by different kinds of fungi and bacteria10. Another study investigated 93 commercially available cosmetic products on the Turkish market, including shampoos, shaving creams, moisturizing products, face care products, and makeup removers11. The microbiological analysis tests on these products showed high gram-negative and positive bacterial contamination11.

An additional serious concern with cosmetics is heavy metal contamination, such as aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co) and many others. Topical cosmetic preparations can act directly on the skin and indirectly by penetrating the skin through systemic circulations. Therefore, harmful consequences of heavy metals contaminations can affect different body organs. This is especially true when these cosmetics are used frequently or when applied on a large surface area of the body as sunscreen and motorizing creams. Although heavy metals such as Pb, As, and Cd have been banned as intentional ingredients in cosmetic products, metal impurities can still be found12. A study that assessed some toxic heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cr, and mercury) in six different cosmetics creams collected from a local Bangladesh market found that the Pb and Cd contents were high in all the tested samples3. A more recent study aimed to determine the concentrations of Co and Pb in four different types of cosmetic products using 41 brands available in Saudi Arabia's local markets and found that the contents of Co were very high13.

This study aims to assess the most commonly used topical cosmetic products and examine if these preparations are up to standard by assessing their organoleptic properties, microbial load and heavy metal impurities.

The Institutional Review Board confirmed that the study proposal complied with national regulations, and the research was given "exempt" status (Registration Number# 21-0330 of Princess Noura University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).

To select the most common products, a closed- and open-ended questionnaire survey was distributed online to the public via social media applications. Consent was obtained from all the participants as the questionnaire started with a consent statement for participants to continue the survey. After the demographic questions, the first part of the survey asked about the frequent use of cosmetics and personal care products such as lotions, creams, toothpaste, shampoo, deodorant, sunblock, body powder, soap, face cleanser, shaving gel, whitening creams, makeup products and hair dyes. Then, the next part of the questions aimed to specify the most common brand for each product.

Based on the survey results, 21 samples of commonly used topical cosmetic products were purchased from local markets and drug stores. The product information is listed in Table 1.

Microbial analysis was performed according to analytical bacteriological methods14.

Nutrient broth (13 g of nutrient broth powder in 1000 ml of distilled water).

Nutrient agar (28 g of nutrient agar powder in 1000 ml of distilled water).

MacConkey agar (55.07 g of MacConkey agar power in 1000 ml of distilled water).

Potato dextrose agar (39 g of potato dextrose powder in 1000 ml of distilled water).

etrimide agar (suspend 46.7 g of cetrimide agar powder in 1000 ml of distilled water and add 10 ml of glycerol).

Simmons’ citrate agar (24 g of Simmons’ citrate agar in 1000 ml of distilled water).

Mannitol salt agar (30 g of mannitol salt agar in 1000 ml of distilled water).

All media were sterilized in an autoclave immediately after preparation and poured directly into sterilized petri dishes.

Samples were analyzed as soon as they were opened from the original containers and were kept at room temperature. Sample preparation was carried out in a sterilized area with 70% alcohol, near a flame and using sterilized equipment (pipettes, tips, test tubes). The samples were prepared by taking 1 g of each product, diluting it in 2 ml of nutrient broth and then incubating it in a Heratherm IGS60 CO2 incubator for 24 h. Samples, such as creams and oil-based products, needed to be more dilute, so 1 ml of Tween 20 was added to the samples. Using a sterilized pipette tip, 20 μl of solution was withdrawn from each of the samples, plated in duplicate on nutrient agar dishes and then incubated for 24 h.

For samples that showed growth, a sterilized tip was swiped on the colonies, dipped in a tube with 2 ml of nutrient broth and incubated for 24 h. 20 μl were withdrawn from each test tube, and the streak plate method was performed on all the Petri dishes using MacConkey, potato dextrose, cetrimide, Simmons’ citrate, and mannitol salt and then incubated for 72 h. After incubation, sterilized tips were swiped on the sample that showed growth on potato dextrose and examined under a microscope to test for the presence of fungi.

A sterilized tip was swiped on the grown colonies of the first nutrient agar that showed growth and transferred to 2 ml of new nutrient broth. The tubes were vortexed and then incubated for 24 h. A serial dilution method was performed for all the tubes by withdrawing 500 μL from all 101 tubes and adding it promptly to each newly prepared nutrient agar dish; the tubes were then vortexed to mix the sample with the agar. The contents were left to solidify at room temperature, and then the dishes were incubated for 24 h. Colonies were counted according to the plate count method.

Sample preparation was performed following elemental impurity procedures in the <232>, USP 40, NF 3515 method. The samples were first digested in a concentrated acid using a closed vessel digestion apparatus. The ratio of the acid mixture used depended on the sample matrix (Table 2).

Elemental impurities were detected using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS). The ICP‒MS calibration curves of the eleven heavy metals were constructed using the blank and standards 5, 15, 30, 70, and 150 ppb for each sample from the standard solution. The elements in the calibration curves showed linearity, and the coefficient of determination values for all elements ranged from 0.9995 to 1, thus showing good fit into the respective curve. The concentrations of the impurities Al, Fe, Zn, Cr, Mn, Cu, Ni, As, Pb, Cd, and Co were determined.

Samples were visually inspected for any lumps, color and odors. The products were rubbed on the skin to test the texture; additionally, pH was determined by using a digital pH meter.

No experiments on humans and/or the use of human tissue sample, and the manuscript file includes a statement identifying the institutional committee approving the experiments. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulation.

Based on 447 responses from both males and females with different ages and education levels (Fig. 1), 21 products were chosen, including sunblock, BB cream, lip balm, hand cream, hair cream, shampoo, cleanser, baby oil, baby powder, soap bar, hair dye, makeup powder, makeup mousse cream, mascara, deodorant, hair serum, shaving gel, lipstick, toothpaste and lotion (Fig. 2). The products were coded and are presented in Table 1.

Demographics of the survey participants.

The most frequently used products according to the 447 participants.

The mean microbial load count and microorganisms found in the topical cosmetic preparations are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 3. No microbial load was found in sunblock, shampoo, cleanser, hair dye, mascara, shaving cream or one of the kinds of toothpaste. Other samples yielded contaminated results, where the microbial load ranged from 1471.5 to 299.5 cfu/ml. Baby oil showed the highest contamination, 1471.5 cfu/ml, whereas lipstick showed the lowest result, 299.5 cfu/ml. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Bacillus species were detected in the samples. S. aureus was found in all the samples, except for the BB cream and hand cream, as Bacillus species were predominant, with microbial loads of 876 cfu/ml and 932 cfu/ml, respectively (Table 3). Lip balm, makeup mousse cream, bar soap and deodorant yielded S. aureus alone, whereas the rest of the samples yielded both S. aureus and Bacillus species.

Microbial count results and permitted limits according to the FDA14 and SCCS16.

The metal concentrations are presented in Table 4.

The samples did not show lumps, grittiness, or discoloration, nor did they have a characteristic odor. The sample pH values ranged from 6.90 to 8.10.

Topical cosmetics are among the most consumed perorations worldwide. In this study, we explored the prevalence of cosmetics usage and examined some of the most common topical cosmetic products in terms of organoleptic properties, microbial load and heavy metal impurities (Fig. 4). This study showed that the participants used at least 5 products daily (Fig. 2). These preparations are intended to be in contact with several parts of the skin; thus, they can serve as vehicles for transmitting many pathogenic organisms2. The skin has defensive mechanisms that can protect the body from external matter; therefore, complete sterility is not essential for cosmetics. However, there is a threshold limit of microorganisms that can be handled by the skin9. This is especially true when cosmetics are applied around the eyes, on injured skin, on children under the age of three, on elderly individuals, and on compromised individuals.

Graphical summary of this study.

The European Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) is a nonprofit organization composed of scientists from diverse professions who assess the safety of cosmetic components16. According to the SCCS ‘Notes of Guidance for Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Safety Evaluation,’ the microbial count must not exceed 100 (cfu)/g or ml for the products intended for children under 3 years or the products intended to be used in the eye area or mucous membranes. However, the microbial count should not exceed 1000 cfu/g for other products.

Moreover, the US FDA microbiological limits in cosmetics specify that the total number of microorganisms per gram or milliliter generally should not exceed 500 cfu/g for eye-area products and those for children < 3 years old, whereas the acceptable limit for all other topical cosmetics is ≤ 1000 cfu/g.

Both the SCCS and FDA consider the presence of opportunistic pathogens (Escherichia coli (E. coli), S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) or Candida albicans (C. albicans)) to be of significant concern.

Our results (Fig. 3) showed that both of the tested baby products exceeded the SCCS permitted limit. This is crucial since babies have a weak immune system, allowing the pathogen to easily enter their system if the skin is damaged17. This syndrome starts with irritability, fever, malaise, and a highly sensitive rash that appears within 24–48 h. Moreover, our study found that the makeup powder, hair cream and hair oil serum also exceeded the limit, with microbial loads of 1161.5 cfu/ml, 1467.5 cfu/ml and 1128 cfu/ml, respectively (Table 2).

In this study, 14 samples of the tested products showed microbial contamination. S. aureus was the most prominent microorganism found in 12 of the samples. In alignment with the study results, published studies have detected S. aureus as the main isolated microorganism in a variety of cosmetics items, in addition to other microorganisms, such as Candida, Rhodotorula, Salmonella, Citrobacter, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Alcaligenes9,18,19,20,21,22. S. aureus is a normal skin microorganism, but it may also act as an opportunistic pathogen that can cause a variety of skin and soft tissue infections23. Eczema, acne, erythematous rash and other skin infections can result from contaminated product usage24. The presence of S. aureus in eye products can cause infection to the external and internal tissues of the eye, including the tear duct, cornea conjunctiva, and posterior chambers, triggering profound damage that may lead to blindness25.

The other detectable microorganism that was found in 10 tested product samples was Bacillus species. Bacillus species are transient skin microflora. The group Bacillus cereus is a Bacillus genus subdivision that currently includes eight formally recognized closely genetically related species that can cause focal necrotizing cellulitis in the skin19. Bacillus cereus contamination can lead to serious eye infections. This is especially true for cosmetics that are used on the eyes or near the eye, as found in this study in a makeup powder. This might be attributed to how powders easily come into contact with air and contain ingredients from a natural sources, such as talc in the formulation, which might increase the contamination level19. A published study showed that a Bacillus cereus with a microbial load as low as 100 cfu/ml caused infection in a susceptible animal model26. Abscesses, bacteremia/septicemia, wound and burn infections, ear infections, ophthalmitis, osteomyelitis, peritonitis, and respiratory and urinary tract infections have all been linked to Bacillus species. The majority of these diseases arise as secondary or mixed infections in immunocompromised individuals, but a high proportion are primary infections in healthy people27. In this study, we investigated the products as soon as they were opened, yet contamination was still found in some of the tested products. Most cosmetics are multiuse items that must retain low levels of contamination during consumer usage, which means that their preservation mechanisms must be efficient against contaminants that come into touch with the product after it has been opened25.

Heavy metal contamination in cosmetics is another serious issue. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act issued by the US suggests limits for some heavy metal impurities in cosmetics, such as lead, arsenic and chromium28. The maximum recommended limit of Pb as an impurity in cosmetics is 10 ppm. Cosmetic lip items (such as lipsticks, lip glosses, and lip liners) and externally applied cosmetics (such as eye shadows, blushes, shampoos, and body lotions) are covered by this guidance. The US FDA also limits the presence of Pb in cosmetic additives to 20 ppm. Our results showed that 6 of the tested cosmetic products exceeded this limit, and the highest value of Pb, 78.31 ppm, was found in sample 20 (toothpaste). Similarly, a study that investigated the same product and brand found but used atomic absorption spectrophotometry found that Pb exceeded the recommended limit with a value of 23.57 ppm29. In our study, we found that toothpastes were among the top most contaminated products that are used daily (Fig. 2). The accumulation of Pb by using lead-containing cosmetics regularly can result in serious side effects30. These side effects can vary from abdominal pain, headache and loss of appetite to more complicated manifestations, such as brain damage, renal dysfunction and paralysis31,32. Pregnant women can experience miscarriage or premature birth and give birth to babies with low birth weight33.

The US FDA has also set the limit for Cr in cosmetics additives to 50 ppm, and most of our tested cosmetic products exceeded this limit. In agreement with this finding, a study that tested nine of the most expensive brands of mascara and eye shadow from the Saudi market found that the level of Cr was higher than the acceptable limit in an eyeshadow product with a value of 7000 ppm34. Digestive, skin and ocular problems are linked to high exposure to Cr35.

Arsenic is limited to 3 ppm in cosmetics additives by the US FDA, and our tested cosmetic products exceeded this limit in samples 12 (makeup powder), 13 (makeup mousse cream), 14 (mascara), 15 (deodorant), 18 (lipstick), 19 (toothpaste), and 20 (toothpaste). The highest concentration of As was found in sample 19 (toothpaste) (221.96 ppm). Long-term exposure to arsenic might result in skin conditions such as lesions and skin, bladder and lung cancers36.

Since there are no limits set for other metals in cosmetics, such as Al, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn, the US Pharmacopeia chapter <232> has established acceptability metal impurity criteria for drug products. Even though these guidelines are meant for drugs in different dosage forms, they may be relevant to avoid undesirable consequences. For example, Cd as an elemental impurity should be limited to 0.5 ppm, where in our tested cosmetic products, samples 1 (sunblock cream), 15 (deodorant), 19 (toothpaste), and 20 (toothpaste) greatly exceeded this limit (Table 3). The continued use of cadmium-contaminated products may cause heart diseases, hypertension, kidney and liver damage, and a weak immune system37.

The USP limits Co as an elemental impurity to 5 ppm, wherein tested cosmetic product samples 12 (makeup powder), 14 (mascara), 19 (toothpaste), and 20 (toothpaste) exceed this limit, and the highest value (22.71 ppm) was detected in sample 12 (makeup powder). Similarly, other cosmetic products exceeded the 5 ppm limit, such as an eyeliner (11.80 ppm)38. Long-term exposure to cosmetic products that are contaminated with Co may cause skin irritation13 Ni should not exceed 20 ppm according to the USP. Interestingly, most of the tested cosmetic products in this study exceeded this limit, and the highest value was detected in sample 19 (toothpaste). The major concern with nickel is allergic contact dermatitis, which can be a serious issue for patients with chronic eczema39,40. The only metal level that did not exceed the USP limit in any of the tested samples was Cu. This elemental impurity should be limited to 300 ppm, and all tested cosmetic products were below this value.

Unfortunately, there are no stated FDA or USP limits for other metals, such as aluminum, iron, zinc, and manganese. Short exposure to lower levels of manganese may lead to erythema and eczema, while chronic exposure has been linked to neurological disorders, such as loss of coordination and balance, forgetfulness, anxiety, and insomnia40,41,42,43. In this study, the highest concentrations of Mn and Fe were detected in sample 14 (mascara). Similarly, Aldayel et al.34 investigated nine of the most expensive brands of mascara and eyeshadow from the Saudi market and found that the concentration of Fe was high in the mascara products. Moreover, frequent use of cosmetics that contain aluminum has been linked to neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, but the exact mechanism is unknown40,44. According to studies, high exposure to Zn, and Cu may lead to the interaction between them that can lead to abnormal Zn metabolism, so the balance between Zn and other nutrients could be destroyed45.

The highest concentrations of Al and Zn in this study were detected in sample 19 (toothpaste) and sample 20 (toothpaste), respectively. In alignment with this result, Al and Zn concentrations were high in different brands of toothpaste31,46.

Based on our tested cosmetic products, the highest levels of Pb, Cr, As, Ni, Zn, Al impurities were found in toothpaste. Interestingly, our results showed that toothpaste was the most frequently used cosmetic product in both sexes (Fig. 2). Therefore, both the quality and safety of cosmetics preparations must be more rigorously regulated.

Although there are some legal criteria to consider during cosmetics manufacture, this study showed that these regulatory procedures are not completely effective. Tests are required by authoritative agencies to ensure the safety and quality of cosmetic products or ingredients before they are put on the market. Moreover, the raw materials should be selected and handled properly by manufacturers.

In this study, we investigated some cosmetic products to show the importance of quality and safety assurance. The study showed that many cosmetic products were used daily, and microbial and heavy metal contamination was found in many of the tested cosmetic products. The continuous use of such contaminated cosmetics can pose risks to human health. The manufacturers of cosmetic preparations must formulate and implement strict protocols for quality assurance, and these must be assessed and evaluated by regulators.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

United States Food and Drug Administration

Saudi Food and Drug Authority

Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety

Saudi standards, Metrology, and Quality Organization

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer

Souto, E. B. et al. Nanomaterials for skin delivery of cosmeceuticals and pharmaceuticals. Appl. Sci. 10, 1594 (2020).

Sharma, G., Gadhiya, J. & Dhanawat, M. A In Textbook of Cosmetic Formulations (2018).

Alam, M. F. et al. Assessment of some heavy metals in selected cosmetics commonly used in Bangladesh and human health risk. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-018-0162-0 (2019).

USP38/NF33, Validation of Compendial Methods Section. In United State Pharmacopeial/National Formul. 2256 (2015).

FD&C Act. Cosmetics & U.S. Law, FDA, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/cosmetics-us-law (accessed 28 November 2021).

Almukainzi, M., Alobaid, R., Aldosary, M., Aldalbahi, Y. & Bashiri, M. Investigation of the effects of different beverages on the disintegration time of over-the-counter medications in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm. J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.04.032 (2021).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Almukainzi, M., Salehi, M., Araci-Bou-Chacra, N. & Löbenberg, R. Investigation of the performance of the disintegration test for dietary supplements. AAPS J. 12, 4. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-010-9221-1 (2010).

Manley, D. Quality Control and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) in the Biscuit Industry (Woodhead Publishing Limited, London, 2011).

Jairoun, A. A., Al-Hemyari, S. S., Shahwan, M. & Zyoud, S. H. An investigation into incidences of microbial contamination in cosmeceuticals in the uae: Imbalances between preservation and microbial contamination. Cosmetics 7(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics7040092 (2020).

Addotey, J. Quality assessment of some topical polyherbal preparations on quality assessment of some topical polyherbal (2016). https://doi.org/10.20959/wjpps20164-6510.

Seher, A., Tan, B., Tüysüz, M. & Ötük, G. Investigation of preservative efficacy and microbiological content of some cosmetics found on the market. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 26(1), 153–157 (2013).

Siti-Zulaikha, R., Sharifah-Norkhadijah, S. I. & Praveena, S. M. Hazardous ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products and health concern : A review. Public Heal. Res. 5(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.phr.20150501.02 (2015).

Ahmed, A. Y., Asada, A. & Hamza, I. A. A. Cobalt and lead concentrations in cosmetic products sold at local markets in Saudi Arabia. Toxicol. Rep. 8, 1693–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.09.004 (2021).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Jo Huang, J. E. M., Hitchins, A. D. & Tran, T. T. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). In FDA (2021). https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-23-methods-cosmetics.

USP, <232>Elemental impurities limits. In USP 38–NF 33, USP 1–5 (2005).

Bernauer, U. et al. The SCCS notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation, 11th revision, 30–31 March 2021. SCCS/1628/21. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105052 (2021).

Handler, M. Z. & Schwartz, R. A. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome: Diagnosis and management in children and adults. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 28(11), 1418–1423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12541 (2014).

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Behravan, J., Bazzaz, F. & Malaekeh, P. Survey of bacteriological contamination of cosmetic creams in Iran (2000). Int. J. Dermatol. 44(6), 482–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.01963.x (2005).

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dadashi, L. & Dehghanzadeh, R. Investigating incidence of bacterial and fungal contamination in shared cosmetic kits available in the women beauty salons. Heal. Promot. Perspect. 6(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2016.25 (2016).

Fatima, N. Bacteriological evaluation and comparison of unused branded and non-branded cosmetic products available in Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. J. Microb. World 2014, 16 (2014).

Anelich, L. E. & Korsten, L. Survey of micro-organisms associated with spoilage of cosmetic creams manufactured in South Africa. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 18(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.1996.tb00133.x (1996).

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lundov, M. D., Moesby, L., Zachariae, C. & Johansen, J. D. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: A review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 60(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01501.x (2009).

Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L. & Fowler, V. G. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28(3), 603–661. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00134-14 (2015).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Feroz, F. & Das, K. K. Presence of microorganisms in commonly used baby cosmetics, available in Dhaka City. Stamford J. Microbiol. 9(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.3329/sjm.v9i1.45650 (2020).

Astley, R., Miller, F. C., Mursalin, M. H., Coburn, P. S. & Callegan, M. C. An eye on staphylococcus aureus toxins: Roles in ocular damage and inflammation. Toxins (Basel) 11(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11060356 (2019).

Pitt, T. L., McClure, J., Parker, M. D., Amézquita, A. & McClure, P. J. Bacillus cereus in personal care products: Risk to consumers. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 37(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12191 (2015).

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Turnbull, P. C. “Bacillus”. In Medical Microbiology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (1996).

US.FDA. FDA’s testing of cosmetics for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, and nickel conten, FDA (2020). https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/potential-contaminants-cosmetics/fdas-testing-cosmetics-arsenic-cadmium-chromium-cobalt-lead-mercury-and-nickel-content#limits.

Orisakwe, O. E., Obinna Okolo, K., Nkeiruka Igweze, Z., Ajaezi, G. C. & Udowelle, N. A. Potential hazards of toxic metals found in toothpastes commonly used in Nigeria. Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 67(2), 197–204 (2016). http://wydawnictwa.pzh.gov.pl/roczniki_pzh/.

Sneha, A., Balaji, K., Francis, Y. M. & Raghunath, G. Awareness of adverse effects of lead-containing cosmetics among the adolescence and young adult population in Chennai. A survey. Medico-Legal Updat. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i1.2444 (2021).

Vella, A. & Attard, E. Analysis of heavy metal content in conventional and herbal toothpastes available at maltese pharmacies. Cosmetics 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/COSMETICS6020028 (2019).

Al-Amry, M., Al-Saikhan, F. & Ayoubi, A. Toxic effect of Cadmium found in eyeliner to the eye of a 21 year old Saudi woman: A case report. Saudi Pharm. J. 19(4), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2011.05.002 (2011).

Ababneh, F. A. & Al-Momani, I. F. Assessments of toxic heavy metals contamination in cosmetic products. Environ. Forensics 19(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2018.1448908 (2018).

Hefne, J. & Al-Dayel, T.A.-A.O. Human exposure to heavy metals from cosmetics. Orient. J. Chem. 65, 5 (2011).

Witkowska, D., Slowik, J. & Chilicka, K. heavy metals and human health: Possible exposure pathways and the competition for protein binding sites. Molecules 26(19), 6060. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196060 (2021).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

WHO. “Arsenic,” https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic (2018).

Nourmoradi, H., Foroghi, M., Farhadkhani, M. & Dastjerdi, M. V. Assessment of lead and cadmium levels in frequently used cosmetic products in Iran. J. Environ. Public Health 2013, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/962727 (2013).

Lim, D. S. et al. Non-cancer, cancer, and dermal sensitization risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetics. J. Toxicol. Environ. Heal. Part A Curr. Issues 81(11), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2018.1451191 (2018).

Torres, F., Das-Graças, M., Melo, M. & Tosti, A. Management of contact dermatitis due to nickel allergy: An update. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s3693 (2009).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Łodyga-Chruścińska, E., Sykuła, A. & Więdłocha, M. Hidden metals in several brands of lipstick and face powder present on polish market. Cosmetics 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics5040057 (2018).

Nassiri, O., EL Hachimi, M. L., Ambrosi, J. P. & Rhoujjati, A. Contamination impact and human health risk in surface soils surrounding the abandoned mine of Zeïda, High Moulouya, Northeastern Morocco. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23(11), 17030–17059 (2021).

Jelenković, A. Aluminum Neurotoxicity : From Subtle Molecular Lesions to Neurological Diseases (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2016).

Haynes, W. M., Lide, D. R. & Bruno, T. J. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: A Ready Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data (CRC, Hoboken, 2012).

Sanajou, S., Şahin, G. & Baydar, T. Aluminium in cosmetics and personal care products. J. Appl. Toxicol. 41(11), 1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4228 (2021).

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zhang, L., Rezeng, C., Wang, Y. & Li, Z. Changes in copper, zinc, arsenic, mercury, and lead concentrations in rat biofluids and tissues induced by the ‘Renqing Changjue’ Pill, a traditional tibetan medicine. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 199(12), 4646–4656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02586-5 (2021).

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Salama, A. K. Assessment of metals in cosmetics commonly used in Saudi Arabia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5550-6 (2015).

This research was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R166), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia

May Almukainzi & Areej M. El Mahdy

College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Lubna Alotaibi, Anfal Abdulwahab & Nada Albukhary

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

M.A.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. L.A., A.A., N.A.: data curation, writing- original draft preparation, resources. A.M.E.M.: methodology, data curation.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Almukainzi, M., Alotaibi, L., Abdulwahab, A. et al. Quality and safety investigation of commonly used topical cosmetic preparations. Sci Rep 12, 18299 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21771-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21771-7

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

Quality and safety investigation of commonly used topical cosmetic preparations | Scientific Reports

Cosmetic Packaging Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.